Share

Related Stories

  • Policy Group Predicts More Industrial Controls In the Future
    The industry will likely see more controls—not less—on industrial processes in both the commercial and Department of Defense (DOD) context. So said Christian Richter, principal with The Policy Group, during an address at the DOD's Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program Conference held in Washington, D.C. earlier this month. In the broader context, Richter forecast a likely trend of increased regulations for chromium and other metals and processes in the future.
  • The Viability of Practical Alternatives for Hexavalent Chromium
    Environmentalists, community leaders, labor representatives, local and national politicians—everyone, it seems, points the finger of blame at hexavalent chromium, accusing the substance of causing everything from groundwater contamination, soil and crop pollution, to human cancer and loss of business to overseas job shops.
  • Profile: Palmetto Plating
    Many finishers "preach" customer service, but at Easley, S.C.-based Palmetto Plating, client focus is Commandment #1.
  • Permanon Surface Coating Technology
    Nanotechnology-based coating reduces or eliminates primary factors that cause many coatings to fail.
  • NASF Reveals Updated Technical Conference Program for SUR/FIN 2010
    The newly amended SUR/FIN 2010 Technical Conference Program contains more than 60 educational sessions.

Top 5 Stories

News

DoD Sees Major Impacts from the European Union’s New Chemical Regulations

16 March 2008

A top Defense Department official says the European Union's (EU) broad chemical regulatory system could have major "indirect" impacts on the Defense Department, including limiting supplies and increasing costs of some materials, although the department will likely be able to comply with the system's direct requirements, such as measures requiring substitution of harmful chemicals. This news comes from a Defense Department alert released earlier this week.

The Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), entered into force in the EU last June, is a regulation that has been touted as an approach to getting more environmental, health, and safety data by forcing chemical manufacturers to show that their products are safe before they can be registered. (MFW, May 9, 2008). In contrast, U.S. law—the Toxic Substances Control Act—generally allows products to be registered unless EPA can show that they are unsafe.

In a presentation at the Joint Services Environmental Management Conference on May 7, Shannon Cunniff, DoD's director of emerging contaminants policy office, REACH will create scores of new emerging contaminants. “For emerging contaminants, what the EU’s implication is, is that right now, we have this sort of small universe of known chemicals, bad actors,” where their environmental and public health impacts are known, she explained. The EU is shifting the paradigm by making the producers and importers of those chemicals and materials identify what those impacts are and include that information in a publicly accessible database, she added.
 
Over time, Cunniff said we’re going to have fewer unknown or non-evaluated chemicals, while the number of known hazardous chemicals might increase—or certainly the ones that have been newly classified as “hazardous." For emerging contaminants, "this means there are potentially all these new emerging contaminants coming down the pike" because the U.S. public will question why these chemicals are being regulated in Europe but not in this country, Cunniff explained. "Hello, what do you think is going to happen?"
 
Cunniff noted that the impact was not merely an issue about compliance. "Can DoD comply with this rule?” she asked rhetorically. “We actually think that we'll be able to work that issue fairly well," she said. However, she questioned what the indirect impacts would be on the broader DoD family. "Regulated materials may in fact become more difficult to obtain because we live in a global economy. And even if they can be obtained, they may be far more costly.”
 
Such difficulties include unexpected disruptions in the supply chain, cross-contamination issues, and a possible rise in the cost of some materials due to supply shifts, Cunniff noted. DoD is already facing cross-contamination issues with regard to lead and lead-free solders, she said. DoD may also need to increase its research into substitutes for use in weapon system development, according to Cunniff.
 
For the complete article, please visit InsideEPA.com.
Source: Defense Environment Alert, Vol. 16, No. 10

 

This article is featured in:
Environmental & Regulatory Compliance

 

Comment on this article

You must be registered and logged in to leave a comment about this article.